Lubuntu used to use LXDE as its default desktop environment. KDE is an extremely customizable desktop environment, with its focus more on the aesthetic side of things. Overall, XFCE is an excellent choice for those users with less than optimal hardware that are looking for a lightweight, responsive, but still fully featured DE.
Skip to content Android Windows Linux Apple. You won't find animation here, but if you like transparent windows, shadows, and similar nuances, you have the option. This desktop environment has not changed much over the years. Therefore, increased system requirements are more often due to the size of the standard apps than to the desktop environment.
Web browsers like Mozilla Firefox may be more functional than they used to be, but they also take up more memory. Although some things have changed, the basics remain the same.
MATE is a little brighter than Xfce, but not by much. A few years ago, LXDE was considered the lightest graphical desktop environment. It started up in seconds and only used a few hundred megabytes of RAM.
You can revive a Windows XP computer with an interface that feels very similar. LXDE is so lightweight that the Raspberry Pi manufacturers used this code to create Raspbian, the device's official operating system. LXDE and LXQt use interchangeable components with very few dependencies background components that are required for software to work.
A light app with a lot of dependencies can still slow your system down. Because of this, the apps you run are almost as important as choosing a desktop environment. Related: What is LXQt? The lightest Linux desktop made with Qt. Need help deciding between two of the above desktop environments? But there are reasons why many people prefer one of the alternatives. Note the following when comparing two of these interfaces directly. Programs open immediately, windows drag around the screen with no dropped frames, and interacting with portions of the desktop like menus and tray icons is really snappy.
Where things get interesting is when you start to look under the hood. This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. If you have a particularly limited system, you may want to choose LXDE. This obviously depends on the implementation, but for the two in question here, XFCE walks away the victor in User Friendliness. It feels like a more well thought-out system where everything integrates tightly.
This makes all the difference in the world for me. XFCE has depth and substance. This is an area where both Desktop Environments are about equal, but for different reasons. For LXDE, every piece is interchangeable. If you want a different panel, window manager, or terminal manager, you have your choice of anything that will run. There are no dependencies to worry about at all.
This can be great for more advanced users who have enough experience and knowledge to have a preference of window manager or just those looking for intense customization. As XFCE is quite popular, there are so many different ways you can customize it. Xubuntu is particularly good-looking, and there are ways to make any XFCE system look the way you want.
A lightweight app with many dependencies can still slow your system down; this is why the apps you run matter nearly as much as your choice of a desktop environment. Need help deciding between any two of the above desktop environments? But there are reasons many people prefer one of the alternatives. Here are things to keep in mind when comparing two of these interfaces directly. LXDE looks more basic compared to Xfce. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment.
Your package manager will usually install these automatically. Newcomers may find that MATE is easier to grasp. While neither desktop is hard to use, MATE presents apps and information in a way where less technical knowledge is required to find your way around. What kind of apps do you prefer? If you prefer Qt software and you want a lighter desktop, then LXQt is a no-brainer. Out of the box, MATE has a few more bells and whistles than Xfce, but it's also a little less customizable.
You might find that it feels a little bit more put together. Xfce uses fewer resources, but this advantage begins to erode as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries.
0コメント